The spec was a Slack thread.
The "plan" is in someone's head.
You've started building anyway.
Someone said "it's straightforward" in standup. It was not straightforward. There were three undocumented edge cases, a dependency nobody mentioned, and a migration path that assumed a table that doesn't exist yet.
You've seen this before
These aren't hypotheticals. They're last Tuesday.
Planning by Slack thread
Thirty messages deep. Half are emoji reactions. The actual decision is somewhere between a GIF and a lunch order.
Missing edge cases
You find them mid-sprint. They're always the ones that triple the estimate and require a schema change.
Scope that quietly expands
'Small refactor' becomes 'rewrite the auth layer.' Nobody remembers agreeing to this. Everybody's working on it.
What a planning session looks like
You describe the problem. Projan asks the questions your team forgot to.
What comes out the other end
Not a vague document. Actual structure you can hand to your team.
A structured plan that captures decisions, constraints, and the things everyone assumed but nobody wrote down
Tasks broken down with context — not just 'implement feature X' but why, what the edge cases are, and what depends on it
One-click export to Jira, ClickUp, Monday.com, Notion, or Google Docs. Your tasks land where your team already works
Start a planning session right in Slack. No context switching, no 'let me open another tool'
The best planning happens when someone asks the question you were hoping nobody would ask.
Projan is that someone. Free while we're in beta. 50% off for life if you join early.
No credit card required. Takes about 30 seconds.